A research carried out in Australia concludes, addressing people who follow a gluten-free diet despite not being celiac disease, gluten-free foods that are not better for health and the food industry is taking advantage of the situation. Experts want consumers to be aware of the halo effect on health associated with these foods.
New research concludes that gluten-free foods are no better for the health of those who do not suffer from celiac disease, even though they believe are better not take products with gluten. The benefits are obvious only for those with gluten intolerance and Jason Wu explains George Institute for Global Health in Australia, an independent medical research organization that works to improve health worldwide. This institute conducts research on various diseases and injuries are preventable, such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, kidney disease, etc.
The popularity of gluten-free foods has been growing year after year, hence has increased the variety of foods that contain gluten, to meet a growing segment of consumers do not celiac disease, consider that these foods are better and more healthy for the body. These people could be defined as celiac volunteers, removed from the shopping cart products containing gluten as you would if the person suffers from celiac disease.
For years now medical experts warn that it is not advisable to carry a gluten-free diet for that conviction, a diagnosis certifying that there are problems or intolerance to complex proteins that form gluten (glutein and gliadin) is needed, the second protein is based intolerance. On the other hand, in order to determine that there are problems with gluten it is necessary for these people to eat foods with gluten, only then can certify that it is necessary to remove it from the diet. There are also cases of people whose analyzes have been negative to intolerance, and are not convinced, maintain their self ensuring that they feel better if you do not take gluten, all spoke in this post.
The above study is the largest of its kind in Australia, researchers analyzed more than 3,200 foods classified in 10 categories, the nutritional content of staple foods in a balanced diet as bread or pasta compared, other products were also compared such as candy, cookies, potato chips, etc. It was found that staple foods containing gluten cited a significantly lower level of protein, other components, such as sugar or sodium content was similar. In general and except for basic foods mentioned, it was determined that foods without gluten are very similar, so the experts want consumers to be aware of the halo effect on health, as there are no benefits are attributed to these foods.
The food industry is taking advantage of the situation, labels gluten-free foods are being used as a marketing tactic to increase sales even foods that contain gluten are labeled, and they could hardly contain, in order to capture the attention of these consumers who are not celiac but want to lead a gluten-free diet. As we know, gluten-free products are more expensive and consume fashion given by healthy people, the industry takes advantage of the situation. Experts from the George Institute research conducted considering that a thorough assessment of the nutritional profile of foods without gluten, as well as the comparison with homonyms foods containing gluten missing.
It is worth noting the results of the Survey of Health and Global Nielsen Welfare, it is determined that 21% of respondents seeking health benefits through a gluten-free diet, showing the large volume of people follow this type of diet. further research is necessary to mention as performed by Mintel, in which it is concluded that have increased by 63% sales of gluten-free foods between 2012 and 2014 in the United States, which also happens in other countries such as Australia.
Returning to the issue of labeling could be considered unjustified, the food industry is using it to inflate an unjustified health among consumers, experts are concerned about eliminating important foods like grains (wheat, rye, barley, etc. ) diet, these foods are a very important source of nutrients and are discarded by erroneous convictions.
To conclude, explain that taking into account the adverse health effects caused by poor diet, Australia and elsewhere in the world out should take political initiatives that promote the consumption of staple foods such as whole grains, fruits and vegetables and reduced consumption of gluten-free foods, considering that this is a public health priority. You can learn more about the research through this article published on the website of the George Institute of Australia.
SOURCE: www.gastronomiaycia.com